Note: One of the first articles that I wrote for my Interactive Journalism grad program at American University. I had to do a quick turn-around story on memorial tours in DC. The weather was horrible (rain, sleet, snow) and I was woefully under-dressed. Reading it over post-graduation I see what I would’ve done differently and better in regards to how I wrote the story and the media usage, but the experience alone made it worth the effort. It taught me persistence in regards to getting the story and to always have a back-up plan in case your story takes a different/unexpected turn.
December 5, 2009
“Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed rounds.” This unofficial motto of the U.S. Post Office can easily apply to U.S. Park Service Tour Guide Brad Berger.
Mr. Berger has been with the U.S. Park Services for over eight years. As part of his job he provides bike and walking tours of the various Washington, DC monuments and memorials such as the Jefferson, Franklin Delanor Roosevelt and the Lincoln.
On this Saturday morning, Berger was scheduled to give a walking tour starting at 9 am, but the weather was not exactly tour-friendly. The temperature was in the low 30s and wind and rain was whipping across the area. Inevitably the rain turned into snow, which made for slippery sidewalks and muddy walkways. In Washington, DC when you have weather this bad everything gets cancelled.
The Tour Guide Awaits
Yet there was Berger standing at the top of the stairs of the Jefferson Memorial waiting to start the tour. When asked about why the tour wasn’t cancelled he said that if “you advertise something you should always show up – you should be there.”
Berger looks like a Hollywood-version of a park ranger. He is a tall, square-jawed solid-looking man with dark-framed eyeglasses. Dressed in a long green rain padded raincoat, green shirt, green tie, comfortable, weatherproof shoes and a beige ranger hat. He did not wear gloves nor carry an umbrella. Berger looked neat and ready to take on the elements and answer any questions.
The tour group looked a little less imposing and a bit daunted by the weather. The group was a small one, consisting of four people of various ages. The group looked wet and cold yet determined to take the tour.
Andrea Zanoletti, 31, from Milan, Italy said that he “didn’t know much about American history” and thought that thetour would be informative. Christopher Sorrentino, 37, from the Thomas Circle neighborhood in DC has been on several DC tours. Sorrentino said that he wanted to know the “history behind the monuments.”
The Memorial Tour Begins
The tour started at the Jefferson Memorial and immediately Berger was in his element. He voice was crisp, his enunciation clear and his enjoyment of history was immediately visible. Berger said that he tries to leave “no stone unturned” in providing his tour groups with information about the memorials.
Berger went over the usual historical facts about iconic figures and events such as Thomas Jefferson, FDR, Abraham Lincoln, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War. He also talked about lesser-known memorials dedicated to George Mason and engineer John Ericcson.
However, he imparted interesting nuggets of information that would peak the interest of tourists or historians which included the following such as that the first cherry blossoms that were given to the U.S. from Japan were infected; that the statues at the Korean Memorial were the first to reflect the minority presence in war memorials and that the Lincoln Memorial had an engraving typo that had to be corrected
More Than Just A Tour Guide
Berger’s knowledge of history is not from being a tour guide. His love of history started as a youth. He said that when he was little he was always reading history books that he borrowed from uncle. Berger said the was a “weird kid.” Eventually this history buff went on to get a B.A. in European History at Shepherd University in Virginia and a Master’s in American Colonialism at Shippensburg State University in Pennsylvania.
As the tour wound its way across the various memorials the temperature dropped and the snow came down harder. The tour group was getting cold. Zanoletti said “It’s Survivor DC” as he kept his head down to head off the snow and rain. Sorrentino said that he was doing “okay” but he looked a bit wet.
Berger didn’t seem the least bothered by the weather nor did he let if affect his tour. In fact, Berger boasted that he used to “run in shorts” in this type of weather while stationed at the Air Force’s South Bavaria, Germany site.
Berger’s enthusiasm for his job is contagious and helped the tour group forget about the bad weather for a little bit. During the tour he said that his job is like a “hobby that he gets paid for” and that if you get a chance to “do what your love it’s well worth it.”
Vietnam Memorial. Arlington Cemetery. Lincoln Memorial. The Washington Monument. Jefferson Memorial. When standing in front these memorials, visitors experience a range of emotions. Awe. Hurt. Sadness. Respect.
The United States National Parks Services(NPS) the government bureau responsible for the maintenance of these memorials, wants visitors to notice and feel the beauty of these memorials – not any aesthetic bruises that would detract from the experience.
However, not every Washington, D.C. memorial is viewed with excitement and reverence by its visitors.
The Ulysses S. Grant Memorial is classified as a presidential memorial, like the Lincoln, Jefferson and FDR, but in terms of recognition it is the poor stepchild of local memorials.
The Grant Memorial is located at between Pennsylvania and Maryland Ave, near the west side of the U.S. Capitol Building. It was dedicated in 1921 in honor of Ulysses S. Grant the 18th president of the United States. It is one of twenty-seven presidential memorials in the United States. It is also the first memorial to be constructed on the National Mall.
Unlike other presidential memorials such as the Lincoln or the Jefferson, Grant’s statue was not in honor of his presidential legacy. Unfortunately, President Grant’s administration from 1869 to 1877 was full of governmental mischief from start to finish. Staff members resigned over a host of scandals such as bribery, extortion, financial kickbacks, embezzlement and causing the gold market to crash.
Grant the President
Grant had a bad habit of hiring the wrong people. He also had an even worse habit of remaining loyal to these malcontents who were steadfastly throwing his presidential administration under the bus, to use a current vernacular.
After his presidency Grant tried to settle back into a normal life, but it was hard due to financial missteps on his part. However, Grant used this time to write his memoirs, which provided the public with its first insight into the presidency. When he died of throat cancer in 1885 over one million people gathered in New York City to watch Grant’s funeral procession and burial ceremonies.
According to Joan Waugh, author of Pageantry of Woe: The Funeral of Ulysses S. Grant, Grant’s funeral was a “spectacle, replete with religious, patriotic, and nationalistic imagery and rhetoric” and that across the country thousands of eulogies and obituaries for Grant “stressed his Christian moral character” and military role in “preserving the Union.” Not much was said about his presidency, which was to be expected.
In the years after his presidency there was a movement to honor Grant with a statue in honor of his work for his country. Though his presidency practically drowned in scandal, Grant’s reputation was saved by one major historical fact. Prior to his presidency, Grant was the magnificent general who led the Union Army to victory against the Confederates in the American Civil War. Grant supporters’ arguments carried the day and the Grant Memorial was built after his death, just like all the other presidential memorials.
Yet the Grant Memorial is not like other presidential memorials. What makes it different is that it is a military memorial that honors a former president.
The Making of the Memorial
The Grant Memorial was made using bronze for the statues and white marble for the platforms. Sculptor Henry Shrady took over twenty years to finish it and died before the dedication ceremonies. Montagna said that Shrady never got a chance to “bask in the glow of adulation regarding the memorial.”
Shrady designed the Grant Memorial to include three sections consisting of Grant in the middle with images of a cavalry charge and an artillery unit on his left and right of Grant statue.
The largest section of the memorial statue at over seventeen feet is Grant posed on a horse with his sword sticking high in the air. The statue exudes strength of character and decisiveness, personality traits that probably served him well during the Civil War. Savage said that Grant “looms above in majestic isolation” over his troops “in his own world, separated from the ordinary soldier. Montagna said that Grant looks “cool and unflappable while all hell is breaking loose around him.”
The ‘hell’ that Montagna is referring to is reflected in the faces of the artillery unit and cavalry charge statues that are next to Grant. These statues show a different side of war.
In the artillery group the men are readying for battle with their faces set in determination for the inevitable with their howitzer in tow. The leader of the artillery looks as if he was caught giving an order in mid-sentence. The horses are charging full steam ahead, necks arched almost prancing while they churn up water and mud as their hooves try to find traction in the land.
As for the cavalry group their determination has given way to fear and pain. The men are huddled together fighting off the cold as their cart takes them to another battle. A horse has lost his footing and is falling down. Unfortunately it has taken a soldier with him who most uncertainly will be trampled to death. The soldier’s face is crying out but no one seems to hear him. Savage said that if you didn’t know any better you would think that it’s an “anti-war” memorial.
The Grant Memorial was highly praised upon its dedication. It also was seen as a first step in the revitalization of Union Square, what is now the National Mall. The goal (McMillan Plan), according to the Commission on the Arts (commonly known as the McMillan Commission) at the time was to have more gardens and parks surrounding the memorial. Instead something called the Lincoln Memorial, built to honor the sixteenth president was dedicated in May 1922, one month after the Grant Memorial dedication. Just like that – the dwarfing of the Grant Memorial had begun.
As more memorials and a reflecting pool popped up along the National Mall the view of the Grant Memorial became more obscure. Others such as Grant historian James Goode and the Washington Post’s Paul Richard have championed the Grant Memorial to raise its recognition, but not too much avail. Too add insult to injury the memorial was also getting worked over by the elements.
Rain and snow created a type of rust that coated the pristine bronze statues of Grant Memorial with a green-like coating that oozed its way down onto the marble. The marble platforms and ballasts have cracks and missing pieces. Not much was done about it until the 1980s when the National Parks Services began cleaning and waxing it again.
Catherine Dewey, Architectural Conservator at the National Park Service said in an “ideal world” the memorial would be cleaned at least once a year. However, she said that the cleaning of monuments and memorials are “partially based on need” and the “higher profile” of the monument.
“Sometimes it’s hard to pick and choose which memorials and monuments deserve funds and which will have to wait a while.” said Montagna.
Dewey said that the National Park Service is seeking funds for the restoration of the Grant in the next few years. In the interim, since the Grant Memorial is not the Lincoln, the Vietnam or the Jefferson it has to wait for its turn in the cleaning rotation.
It is highly unlikely that the Grant Memorial will ever see the number of visitors as the Lincoln or the Jefferson. Savage said the area around the memorial is not set-up for visitors, with the reflecting pool blocking access to the memorial. Plus he said “it’s Grant – not Lincoln” and that “each has a much different place in our memory.”
Yet there are people out there who think that the Grant Memorial still has a shot at recognition. Savage said that the memorial needs to be “interpreted for contemporary use” with kiosks, podcasts or audio and “create a whole new physical circulation to the Mall area” to include the Grant memorial in its foot traffic. Or maybe the memorial should be rebranded as a statue-like movie as described by Richards “offering horses at full gallop drama, ceaseless action, bugle calls, grunts and screams.” Also, Grant has become pretty popular in the publishing industry, with some authors saying that his presidency wasn’t all that bad. But is that enough?
Maybe the Grant Memorial one day will get the recognition its supporters thinks it deserves. But as long as it is staring across the Lincoln Memorial that recognition will always be hard to find.